On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:55:49 -0800
Tim Pepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu 14 Feb at 20:48:38 +0900 [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> >
> > I have a slight doubt on the breakup code though I'm not sure you hit
> > the code. Reverting only the breakup part works? The patch is against
> > 2.6.24.
>
> I've tested this revert you posted. Essentially the same trace is logged
> (see below). The machine doesn't die though. But /proc/scsi/scsi doesn't
> show the hardware and I am getting an additional trace dumped now (see
> futher below).
Thanks. So we surely have a bug in the non-breakup part.
I've just found one bug. Can you try this patch against 2.6.24?
Thanks,
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ips.c b/drivers/scsi/ips.c
index 5c5a9b2..d8f5eb5 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ips.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ips.c
@@ -1575,12 +1575,12 @@ ips_make_passthru(ips_ha_t *ha, struct scsi_cmnd *SC,
ips_scb_t *scb, int intr)
ips_passthru_t *pt;
int length = 0;
int i, ret;
- struct scatterlist *sg = scsi_sglist(SC);
+ struct scatterlist *sg;
METHOD_TRACE("ips_make_passthru", 1);
scsi_for_each_sg(SC, sg, scsi_sg_count(SC), i)
- length += sg[i].length;
+ length += sg->length;
if (length < sizeof (ips_passthru_t)) {
/* wrong size */
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
