On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 17:38 +0000, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) wrote: > So far the T10 Base feature set proposal has not been restating > requirements already required by the core standards - it's just > upgrading "mays" and "shoulds" to "shalls". Should we also include a > list of "shall" rules like this that have had known violations in the > past?
You mean trying to catalogue known broken behaviour? That's a pretty monumental task, particularly when you have to deal with all the USB SCSI implementations, which is where a lot of our current violations come from. James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
