From: Bart Van Assche <bvanass...@acm.org>
Eliminate a get_device() / put_device() pair from scsi_next_command().
Both are atomic operations hence removing these slightly improves
performance.
[hch: slight changes due to different context]
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanass...@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
---
drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index 7d35678..91ca414 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -526,14 +526,9 @@ void scsi_next_command(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
struct scsi_device *sdev = cmd->device;
struct request_queue *q = sdev->request_queue;
- /* need to hold a reference on the device before we let go of the cmd */
- get_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
-
scsi_put_command(cmd);
- put_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
scsi_run_queue(q);
- /* ok to remove device now */
put_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
}
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
