On 02/12/2014 01:41 PM, Richard Yao wrote: > On 02/12/2014 02:25 PM, Dan Williams wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Richard Yao <[email protected]> wrote: >>> You should use `git send-email` to send the patch to all of the people >>> listed by get_maintainer.pl: >> >> I see nothing wrong with the patch Joe originally submitted: >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=138609455422179&w=2 >> >>> >>> richard@desktop ~/devel/linux $ scripts/get_maintainer.pl --file >>> drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c >>> "James E.J. Bottomley" <[email protected]> (maintainer:SCSI >>> SUBSYSTEM) >>> [email protected] (open list:SCSI SUBSYSTEM) >>> [email protected] (open list) >>> >>> If I see that James E.J. Bottomley is already on CC for this discussion, >>> but my recent (and first) experience submitting a patch for another >>> subsystem was that they are ignored unless this strict procedure is >>> followed. >>> >>> If the maintainer does not respond within a month after doing this, I >>> suggest informing Linus Torvalds via email that the subsystem maintainer >>> is non-responsive. >>> >> >> Just re-ping James, he'll get to it... >> > > That was intended as generic advice. Sadly, I don't have a copy of the > email headers for the original patch submission, so I can't inspect it. > > That being said, I am receiving these emails because I suggested Matthew > to include the Gentoo kernel team alias on the CC list when I advised > him to send this report upstream. > I haven't had a chance to test this yet (I'm haven't rebooted yet). I do intend to let you know when I do reboot (probably tonight, the last resliver is done 'soon').
-- -- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
