On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 12:28 +0000, Saxena, Sumit wrote:
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Jasper Spaans [mailto:[email protected]]
> >Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 5:53 PM
> >To: DL-MegaRAID Linux
> >Cc: [email protected]
> >Subject: [PATCH] megaraid_sas: make the log message about rescanning
> >more informative.
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >I was working on one of our servers, and saw the following interesting
> >message in dmesg:
> >
> >[20961024.720972] scanning ...
> >
> >This scared me somewhat. Please find a patch to make it easier to see where
> >this message is coming from.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Jasper
> >
> >---
> > drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c |    2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
> >b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
> >index 1f0ca68..3457289 100644
> >--- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
> >+++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
> >@@ -5461,7 +5461,7 @@ megasas_aen_polling(struct work_struct *work)
> >     }
> >
> >     if (doscan) {
> >-            printk(KERN_INFO "scanning ...\n");
> >+            printk(KERN_INFO "Rescanning MegaRAID devices ...\n");
> >             megasas_get_pd_list(instance);
> >             for (i = 0; i < MEGASAS_MAX_PD_CHANNELS; i++) {
> >                     for (j = 0; j < MEGASAS_MAX_DEV_PER_CHANNEL;
> >j++) {
> >--
> >1.7.9.5
> Acked-by: Sumit Saxena <[email protected]>

I'd prefer consistency for this: Most of the messages in this driver
have a megasas: prefix ... but there are quite a large number that don't
(and which probably should have).  If this is necessary, please use the
standard driver prefix.

Thanks,

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to