On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:04:58PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> 
> Looks your approach is simpler.
> 
> But looks there is one problem if I understand correctly:
> __blk_recalc_rq_segments() may not cover the last vector
> because bio->bi_iter.bi_size isn't updated until the end of
> __bio_add_page().
> 
> But it shouldn't have been related with current virtio-blk problem.
>

This is a valid point, bi_iter.bi_size influences the behaviour of
blk_recount_segments(). Maybe Jens can confirm your observation.

Anyway it doesn't explain the reason behind the regression
introduced by commit 3979ef4dcf

Maurizio Lombardi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to