On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 08:21:01AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > We've been ineffectively trying to split them between target and > initiator, since it's effectively both. Now that we seem to have a > workable process, why don't we just take everything (target scsi-queue > and vhost) through the SCSI tree, that way we don't get into these > problems in future.
virtio-scsi has nothing to do with the target. I also think sending target updates through the scsi tree doesn't seem very useful, as there's is no shared code to start with. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
