On 06/25/2014 06:51 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
This saves us an atomic operation for each I/O submission and completion
for the usual case where the driver doesn't set a per-target can_queue
value.  Only a few iscsi hardware offload drivers set the per-target
can_queue value at the moment.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
---
  drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c |   17 ++++++++++++-----
  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index a39d5ba..a64b9d3 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -295,7 +295,8 @@ void scsi_device_unbusy(struct scsi_device *sdev)
        unsigned long flags;

        atomic_dec(&shost->host_busy);
-       atomic_dec(&starget->target_busy);
+       if (starget->can_queue > 0)
+               atomic_dec(&starget->target_busy);

        if (unlikely(scsi_host_in_recovery(shost) &&
                     (shost->host_failed || shost->host_eh_scheduled))) {
@@ -1335,6 +1336,9 @@ static inline int scsi_target_queue_ready(struct 
Scsi_Host *shost,
                spin_unlock_irq(shost->host_lock);
        }

+       if (starget->can_queue <= 0)
+               return 1;
+
        busy = atomic_inc_return(&starget->target_busy) - 1;
        if (busy == 0 && atomic_read(&starget->target_blocked) > 0) {
                if (atomic_dec_return(&starget->target_blocked) > 0)
@@ -1344,7 +1348,7 @@ static inline int scsi_target_queue_ready(struct 
Scsi_Host *shost,
                                 "unblocking target at zero depth\n"));
        }

-       if (starget->can_queue > 0 && busy >= starget->can_queue)
+       if (busy >= starget->can_queue)
                goto starved;
        if (atomic_read(&starget->target_blocked) > 0)
                goto starved;
@@ -1356,7 +1360,8 @@ starved:
        list_move_tail(&sdev->starved_entry, &shost->starved_list);
        spin_unlock_irq(shost->host_lock);
  out_dec:
-       atomic_dec(&starget->target_busy);
+       if (starget->can_queue > 0)
+               atomic_dec(&starget->target_busy);
        return 0;
  }

@@ -1473,7 +1478,8 @@ static void scsi_kill_request(struct request *req, struct 
request_queue *q)
         */
        atomic_inc(&sdev->device_busy);
        atomic_inc(&shost->host_busy);
-       atomic_inc(&starget->target_busy);
+       if (starget->can_queue > 0)
+               atomic_inc(&starget->target_busy);

        blk_complete_request(req);
  }
@@ -1642,7 +1648,8 @@ static void scsi_request_fn(struct request_queue *q)
        return;

   host_not_ready:
-       atomic_dec(&scsi_target(sdev)->target_busy);
+       if (scsi_target(sdev)->can_queue > 0)
+               atomic_dec(&scsi_target(sdev)->target_busy);
   not_ready:
        /*
         * lock q, handle tag, requeue req, and decrement device_busy. We

Hmm. 'can_queue' can be changed by the LLDD. Don't we need some sort of synchronization here?
(Or move that to atomic_t, too?)

Cheers,

Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                   zSeries & Storage
[email protected]                          +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to