We should prefer `struct pci_device_id` over `DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE` to meet
kernel coding style guidelines. This issue was reported by checkpatch.
Signed-off-by: Benoit Taine <benoit.ta...@lip6.fr>
---
Tested by compilation without errors.
drivers/scsi/BusLogic.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/BusLogic.c b/drivers/scsi/BusLogic.c
index 972f817..64c7514 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/BusLogic.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/BusLogic.c
@@ -3893,7 +3893,7 @@ __setup("BusLogic=", blogic_setup);
PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0},
{ }
};*/
-static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(blogic_pci_tbl) = {
+static const struct pci_device_id blogic_pci_tbl[] = {
{PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BUSLOGIC,
PCI_DEVICE_ID_BUSLOGIC_MULTIMASTER)},
{PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BUSLOGIC,
PCI_DEVICE_ID_BUSLOGIC_MULTIMASTER_NC)},
{PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BUSLOGIC, PCI_DEVICE_ID_BUSLOGIC_FLASHPOINT)},
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
