ping?  ?I'd really like to get a review on this one and merge it for
3.17

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 08:28:38AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Thanks, this one looks good to me.  Can someone else give me a second
> review on the attached patch so I can merged it?
> 
> ---
> >From 95bc83fa0d6e9a6152cd6fce79ff87c0994e83ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Janusz Dziemidowicz <rrapt...@nails.eu.org>
> Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 15:48:46 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] Do not issue SCSI RSOC command to Promise Vtrak E610f
> 
> Some devices don't like REPORT SUPPORTED OPERATION CODES and will
> simply timeout causing sd_mod init to take a very very long time.
> Introduce BLIST_NO_RSOC scsi scan flag, that stops RSOC from being
> issued. Add it to Promise Vtrak E610f entry in scsi scan
> blacklist. Fixes bug #79901 reported at
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79901
> 
> Fixes: 98dcc2946adb ("SCSI: sd: Update WRITE SAME heuristics")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janusz Dziemidowicz <rrapt...@nails.eu.org>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/scsi_devinfo.c | 1 +
>  drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c    | 6 ++++++
>  include/scsi/scsi_devinfo.h | 1 +
>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_devinfo.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_devinfo.c
> index f969aca..49014a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_devinfo.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_devinfo.c
> @@ -222,6 +222,7 @@ static struct {
>       {"PIONEER", "CD-ROM DRM-602X", NULL, BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_SINGLELUN},
>       {"PIONEER", "CD-ROM DRM-604X", NULL, BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_SINGLELUN},
>       {"PIONEER", "CD-ROM DRM-624X", NULL, BLIST_FORCELUN | BLIST_SINGLELUN},
> +     {"Promise", "VTrak E610f", NULL, BLIST_SPARSELUN | BLIST_NO_RSOC},
>       {"Promise", "", NULL, BLIST_SPARSELUN},
>       {"QUANTUM", "XP34301", "1071", BLIST_NOTQ},
>       {"REGAL", "CDC-4X", NULL, BLIST_MAX5LUN | BLIST_SINGLELUN},
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> index e02b3aa..70919fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> @@ -922,6 +922,12 @@ static int scsi_add_lun(struct scsi_device *sdev, 
> unsigned char *inq_result,
>       if (*bflags & BLIST_USE_10_BYTE_MS)
>               sdev->use_10_for_ms = 1;
>  
> +     /* some devices don't like REPORT SUPPORTED OPERATION CODES
> +      * and will simply timeout causing sd_mod init to take a very
> +      * very long time */
> +     if (*bflags & BLIST_NO_RSOC)
> +             sdev->no_report_opcodes = 1;
> +
>       /* set the device running here so that slave configure
>        * may do I/O */
>       ret = scsi_device_set_state(sdev, SDEV_RUNNING);
> diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_devinfo.h b/include/scsi/scsi_devinfo.h
> index 447d2d7..1d5ba9e 100644
> --- a/include/scsi/scsi_devinfo.h
> +++ b/include/scsi/scsi_devinfo.h
> @@ -32,4 +32,5 @@
>  #define BLIST_ATTACH_PQ3     0x1000000 /* Scan: Attach to PQ3 devices */
>  #define BLIST_NO_DIF         0x2000000 /* Disable T10 PI (DIF) */
>  #define BLIST_SKIP_VPD_PAGES 0x4000000 /* Ignore SBC-3 VPD pages */
> +#define BLIST_NO_RSOC                0x8000000 /* don't try REPORT SUPPORTED 
> OPERATION CODES */
>  #endif
> -- 
> 1.9.3
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
---end quoted text---
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to