On 29/01/2015 00:00, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Lock the device embedded in the scsi_device to protect against > concurrent calls to ->remove. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
I wonder if this makes this problem: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/5/9 go away. Paolo > --- > drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c | 7 +++---- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c > index 983aed1..523faee 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c > @@ -1593,16 +1593,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_add_device); > > void scsi_rescan_device(struct device *dev) > { > - if (!dev->driver) > - return; > - > - if (try_module_get(dev->driver->owner)) { > + device_lock(dev); > + if (dev->driver && try_module_get(dev->driver->owner)) { > struct scsi_driver *drv = to_scsi_driver(dev->driver); > > if (drv->rescan) > drv->rescan(dev); > module_put(dev->driver->owner); > } > + device_unlock(dev); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_rescan_device); > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
