On Sun, 2015-04-05 at 23:59 +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> The scatterlist for protection information which is passed to
> sbc_dif_verify_read() or sbc_dif_verify_write() requires that
> neighboring scatterlist entries are contiguous or chained so that they
> can be iterated by sg_next().
> 
> However, the protection information for RD-MCP backends could be located
> in the multiple scatterlist arrays when the ramdisk space is too large.
> So if the read/write request straddles this boundary, sbc_dif_verify_read()
> or sbc_dif_verify_write() can't iterate all scatterlist entries.
> 
> This fixes it by allocating temporary scatterlist if it is needed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <[email protected]>
> Cc: Nicholas Bellinger <[email protected]>
> Cc: Sagi Grimberg <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <[email protected]>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> ---
> * No change from v1
> 
>  drivers/target/target_core_rd.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c b/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c
> index ac5e8d2..6e25eaa 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_rd.c
> @@ -390,11 +390,12 @@ static sense_reason_t rd_do_prot_rw(struct se_cmd *cmd, 
> dif_verify dif_verify)
>       struct se_device *se_dev = cmd->se_dev;
>       struct rd_dev *dev = RD_DEV(se_dev);
>       struct rd_dev_sg_table *prot_table;
> +     bool need_to_release = false;
>       struct scatterlist *prot_sg;
>       u32 sectors = cmd->data_length / se_dev->dev_attrib.block_size;
> -     u32 prot_offset, prot_page;
> +     u32 prot_offset, prot_page, prot_npages;
>       u64 tmp;
> -     sense_reason_t rc;
> +     sense_reason_t rc = TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
>  
>       tmp = cmd->t_task_lba * se_dev->prot_length;
>       prot_offset = do_div(tmp, PAGE_SIZE);
> @@ -404,10 +405,40 @@ static sense_reason_t rd_do_prot_rw(struct se_cmd *cmd, 
> dif_verify dif_verify)
>       if (!prot_table)
>               return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
>  
> -     prot_sg = &prot_table->sg_table[prot_page -
> -                                     prot_table->page_start_offset];
> +     prot_npages = DIV_ROUND_UP(prot_offset + sectors * se_dev->prot_length,
> +                                PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> +     /* prot pages straddles multiple scatterlist tables */
> +     if (prot_table->page_end_offset < prot_page + prot_npages - 1) {
> +             int i;
> +
> +             prot_sg = kcalloc(prot_npages, sizeof(*prot_sg), GFP_KERNEL);
> +             if (!prot_sg)
> +                     return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
> +
> +             need_to_release = true;
> +             sg_init_table(prot_sg, prot_npages);
> +
> +             for (i = 0; i < prot_npages; i++) {
> +                     if (prot_page + i > prot_table->page_end_offset) {
> +                             prot_table = rd_get_prot_table(dev,
> +                                                             prot_page + i);
> +                             if (!prot_table)
> +                                     goto out;
> +                             sg_unmark_end(&prot_sg[i - 1]);
> +                     }
> +                     prot_sg[i] = prot_table->sg_table[prot_page + i -
> +                                             prot_table->page_start_offset];
> +             }
> +     } else {
> +             prot_sg = &prot_table->sg_table[prot_page -
> +                                             prot_table->page_start_offset];
> +     }
>  

Mmm, how about just explicitly doing sg_link() at prot_table scatterlist
creation time instead..?

That would save the extra allocation above, and AFAICT make for simpler
code.

--nab

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to