>-----Original Message----- >From: Sumit Saxena [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 6:03 PM >To: 'Christoph Hellwig' >Cc: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; >'[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; Kashyap Desai >Subject: RE: [PATCH RESEND 6/18] megaraid_sas : Use Block layer tag support >for internal command indexing > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:[email protected]] >>Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 4:12 PM >>To: [email protected] >>Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; >>[email protected]; [email protected]; >>[email protected]; [email protected] >>Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 6/18] megaraid_sas : Use Block layer tag >>support for internal command indexing >> >>This patch needs to be split up: the return_cmd calling convenion >>changes should be a pach on it's own, the various new debug printks >>should be a patch on their own, or better jsut be dropped. > >I can work on this. Logically, there can be two patches- 1) BLK tag support 2) >changes in calling convention of return_cmd (this patch will revert the changes >done by patch- 90dc9d9 megaraid_sas : MFI MPT linked list corruption fix). >So patch #2 will be very much dependent on patch #1. If someone applies >patch #2 without applying patch#1, then bug fixed by "90dc9d9 megaraid_sas >: MFI MPT linked list corruption fix " will be exposed again. >That's why I club these two patches in a single patch. Regarding debug prints, >that can be removed.
Christoph, I have started rework for the patches. I will remove debug printks. Can you please let me know should I go for separate patch for change in calling convention return_cmd? Thanks, Sumit >> >>Also please drop the BLK_TAG_REFCOUNT/DEBUG code that shouldn't be >ina >>production driver. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
