On 4/25/2015 5:33 PM, Akinobu Mita wrote:
Now we can generate correct PI for WRITE SAME command, so it is
unnecessary to disallow WRITE SAME when protection info is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.m...@gmail.com>
Cc: Nicholas Bellinger <n...@linux-iscsi.org>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sa...@mellanox.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.peter...@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com>
Cc: target-de...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
---
* No change from v2
drivers/target/target_core_file.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_file.c
b/drivers/target/target_core_file.c
index 829817a..fe98f58 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_file.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_file.c
@@ -376,16 +376,12 @@ fd_execute_write_same(struct se_cmd *cmd)
struct bio_vec *bvec;
unsigned int len = 0, i;
ssize_t ret;
+ sense_reason_t rc;
if (!nolb) {
target_complete_cmd(cmd, SAM_STAT_GOOD);
return 0;
}
- if (cmd->prot_op) {
- pr_err("WRITE_SAME: Protection information with FILEIO"
- " backends not supported\n");
- return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
- }
if (cmd->t_data_nents > 1 ||
cmd->t_data_sg[0].length != cmd->se_dev->dev_attrib.block_size) {
@@ -397,6 +393,10 @@ fd_execute_write_same(struct se_cmd *cmd)
return TCM_INVALID_CDB_FIELD;
}
+ rc = sbc_dif_verify(cmd, cmd->t_task_lba, nolb, 0, cmd->t_prot_sg, 0);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+
bvec = kcalloc(nolb, sizeof(struct bio_vec), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!bvec)
return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
@@ -418,6 +418,14 @@ fd_execute_write_same(struct se_cmd *cmd)
return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
}
+ if (cmd->prot_op) {
+ ret = fd_do_rw(cmd, fd_dev->fd_prot_file, se_dev->prot_length,
+ cmd->t_prot_sg, cmd->t_prot_nents,
+ cmd->prot_length, 1);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
+ }
+
target_complete_cmd(cmd, SAM_STAT_GOOD);
return 0;
}
This looks good,
iblock is needed too though. I think you just need a missing call to
iblock_alloc_bip() and you're good to go (you can use scsi_debug with
dif/dix to test it). I think it belongs in the same patch.
Sagi.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html