> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sumit Saxena [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 3:52 PM
> To: 'Tomas Henzl'; '[email protected]'
> Cc: Kashyap Desai; Kiran Kumar Kasturi
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] megaraid_sas: init tasklet earlier
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tomas Henzl [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 7:45 PM
> > To: Sumit Saxena; [email protected]
> > Cc: Kashyap Desai; Kiran Kumar Kasturi
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] megaraid_sas: init tasklet earlier
> >
> > On 26.8.2015 15:15, Sumit Saxena wrote:
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Tomas Henzl [mailto:[email protected]]
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 7:02 PM
> > >> To: [email protected]
> > >> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> > >> [email protected]
> > >> Subject: [PATCH] megaraid_sas: init tasklet earlier
> > >>
> > >> It may happen (kdump), that an interrupt is invoked just after the
> > > setup_irqs
> > >> function was called but before the tasklet was initialised.
> > >> At this phase the hw ints should have been disabled, but for
> > >> unknown
> > > reason this
> > >> mechanism seems to not work properly.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Tomas Henzl <[email protected]>
> > >> ---
> > >>  drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c | 6 +++---
> > >>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
> > >> b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
> > >> index 71b884dae2..c8e0c6de80 100644
> > >> --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
> > >> +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
> > >> @@ -4627,6 +4627,9 @@ static int megasas_init_fw(struct
> > >> megasas_instance
> > >> *instance)
> > >>                  "current msix/online cpus\t: (%d/%d)\n",
> > >>                  instance->msix_vectors, (unsigned 
> > >> int)num_online_cpus());
> > >>
> > >> +        tasklet_init(&instance->isr_tasklet, 
> > >> instance->instancet->tasklet,
> > >> +                (unsigned long)instance);
> > >> +
> > >>          if (instance->msix_vectors ?
> > >>                  megasas_setup_irqs_msix(instance, 1) :
> > >>                  megasas_setup_irqs_ioapic(instance))
> > >> @@ -4647,9 +4650,6 @@ static int megasas_init_fw(struct
> > >> megasas_instance
> > >> *instance)
> > >>          if (instance->instancet->init_adapter(instance))
> > >>                  goto fail_init_adapter;
> > >>
> > >> -        tasklet_init(&instance->isr_tasklet, 
> > >> instance->instancet->tasklet,
> > >> -                (unsigned long)instance);
> > >> -
> > >>          instance->instancet->enable_intr(instance);
> > >>
> > >>          printk(KERN_ERR "megasas: INIT adapter done\n");
> > >
> > > Patch looks harmless and it fixes your problem then it's fine. But
> > > we need to know the reason why interrupts are coming even if they
> > > are not enabled by that time. Can you provide controller's FW
> > > version ? I would like to try this locally.
> >
> > It is a "PERC 6/i Integrated" with
> > FW Version         : 1.22.02-0612
> > BIOS Version       : 2.04.00
> > ------------------
> >
> > Even when you'll be able to fix it by another means, we can take my
> > patch too, just because it calls the init functions in proper order and
> > so it is
> safe(r).
> Looks good.
> Acked-by: Sumit Saxena <[email protected]>

I have posted same patch with subject- [PATCH 08/12] megaraid_sas :
Initialize tasklet before setting up IRQs.
Please ignore this patch to avoid confusion.

Thanks,
Sumit
>
> >
> > >
> > >> --
> > >> 2.4.3
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi"
> > > in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo
> > > info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to