2015-09-13 23:52 GMT+09:00 Yaniv Gardi <yga...@codeaurora.org>:
> We put the UFS device in sleep state & UFS link in hibern8 state during
> runtime suspaned. After this we put all the UFS rails in low power
> modes immediately but it seems some devices may still draw more than
> sleep current from UFS rails (especially from VCCQ rail) atleast for
> 500us.
> To avoid this situation, this change adds 2ms delay before putting
> these UFS rails in LPM mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Subhash Jadavani <subha...@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Yaniv Gardi <yga...@codeaurora.org>
>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index 20b4c0e..786df28 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -5694,6 +5694,15 @@ out:
> static void ufshcd_vreg_set_lpm(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> {
> /*
> + * It seems some UFS devices may keep drawing more than sleep current
> + * (atleast for 500us) from UFS rails (especially from VCCQ rail).
> + * To avoid this situation, add 2ms delay before putting these UFS
> + * rails in LPM mode.
> + */
> + if (!ufshcd_is_link_active(hba))
> + usleep_range(2000, 2100);
> +
Shouldn't we define dev_quirks for this?
> + /*
> * If UFS device is either in UFS_Sleep turn off VCC rail to save some
> * power.
> *
> --
> 1.8.5.2
>
> --
> QUALCOMM ISRAEL, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of
> Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
