On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 2:44 PM, James Bottomley <james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com> wrote: [..] > The fundamental problem with this is how have the conditions that caused > us to move away from list restart: > > commit bc3f02a795d3b4faa99d37390174be2a75d091bd > Author: Dan Williams <d...@fb.com> > Date: Tue Aug 28 22:12:10 2012 -0700 > > [SCSI] scsi_remove_target: fix softlockup regression on hot remove > > Which was triggered by this bug report > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1348679 > > been mitigated? >
I think it has because the problem that led to that report was the fact that scsi_target_destroy() did not advance the target state, but we changed that in f2495e228fce. http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=144527527308725&w=2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
