Hannes:

A very valid point. Thanks for your suggestion.
Will look at resolving the issue in blk-mq.

Regards,
- Manoj

On 11/11/2015 1:28 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
Shouldn't we rather fixup blk-mq to properly support SG_NONE?
Silently converting SG_NONE (=0) to 1 has a fair chance of breaking
non-mq enabled setups, which happily work with SG_NONE currently.

Cheers,

Hannes


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to