"Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.ve...@intel.com> writes: > On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 14:14 -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote: >> >> I'm not sure whether it makes sense to continue without badblock >> management for the RAID code. I was hoping Neil would comment on >> that. >> >> -Jeff > > Not sure I follow? I believe I've kept all the badblocks functionality > RAID already had..
What I mean to say is that the RAID code had previously embedded the badblocks structure in one of its other data structures. As a result, you would never get an allocation failure for it. > On a related note, something I observed when testing with md: > > md's badblock list is per-device, and can be seen at: > /sys/block/md0/md/dev-pmem0/bad_blocks > > Now if we have badblocks in the gendisks too, there is also: > /sys/block/pmem0/bad_blocks > > The two are separate 'accounts' maintained by separate drivers (md for > the former, and pmem for the latter). This can potentially be > confusing.. > > Should we consolidate the two, i.e. make md (re)use the gendisk > badblocks for its purposes too? I agree with what Dan said. Cheers, Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
