On 02/11/2016 09:25 PM, Ewan Milne wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 15:34 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> Sending a 'REPORT TARGET PORT GROUP' command is a costly operation,
>> as the array has to gather information about all ports.
>> So instead of using RTPG to poll for a status update when a port
>> is in transitioning we should be sending a TEST UNIT READY, and
>> wait for the sense code to report success.
> 
> Note that we may need to add a timeout on this somehow, I have
> recently seen a bug report where an array stayed in the ALUA
> transitioning state for an extremely long period of time.
> 
> That problem would occur with either the current or this new
> ALUA code, the question is whether we want to handle it better.
> 
There already is provisioning in the code to set the port to STANDBY
if the transitioning time is exceeded.
Not that this code path is well tested, but it's there :-)

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                Teamlead Storage & Networking
h...@suse.de                                   +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to