Remove incorrect lockdep assertion from lpfc_sli_hbqbuf_find() which acquires
the hbalock itself. Fix the comment which resulted in this mistake.
Fixes: 1c2ba475eb0e ("lpfc: Add lockdep assertions")
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Herbszt <[email protected]>
diff -uNr -U 5 a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c 2016-03-15 03:25:44.324554218 +0100
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c 2016-04-17 13:01:59.700182669 +0200
@@ -1998,24 +1998,21 @@
/**
* lpfc_sli_hbqbuf_find - Find the hbq buffer associated with a tag
* @phba: Pointer to HBA context object.
* @tag: Tag of the hbq buffer.
*
- * This function is called with hbalock held. This function searches
- * for the hbq buffer associated with the given tag in the hbq buffer
- * list. If it finds the hbq buffer, it returns the hbq_buffer other wise
- * it returns NULL.
+ * This function searches for the hbq buffer associated with the given tag in
+ * the hbq buffer list. If it finds the hbq buffer, it returns the hbq_buffer
+ * otherwise it returns NULL.
**/
static struct hbq_dmabuf *
lpfc_sli_hbqbuf_find(struct lpfc_hba *phba, uint32_t tag)
{
struct lpfc_dmabuf *d_buf;
struct hbq_dmabuf *hbq_buf;
uint32_t hbqno;
- lockdep_assert_held(&phba->hbalock);
-
hbqno = tag >> 16;
if (hbqno >= LPFC_MAX_HBQS)
return NULL;
spin_lock_irq(&phba->hbalock);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
