On 05/25/2016 11:13 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 05/25/2016 12:55 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>> + spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
>> + wait_event_lock_irq(q->reset_wq,
>> + !queue_flag_test_and_set(QUEUE_FLAG_RESETTING, q),
>> + *q->queue_lock);
>> + if (blk_queue_dead(q)) {
>> + rc = -ENODEV;
>> + spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
>> + goto done;
>> + }
>> + spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
>
> Is the flag QUEUE_FLAG_RESETTING used to serialize blk_reset_queue()
> calls? If so, please consider using a mutex instead. Lockdep can detect
> lock inversion for mutexes and spinlocks but not for serialization that
> is based on wait_event_lock_irq() loops.
Will do.
>
>> + if (q->mq_ops) {
>> + blk_mq_stop_hw_queues(q);
>> + blk_mq_freeze_queue(q);
>> +
>> + eh_rc = q->mq_ops->reset(q);
>> +
>> + blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q);
>> + blk_mq_start_stopped_hw_queues(q, true);
>> + } else if (q->reset_fn) {
>> + spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
>> + blk_stop_queue(q);
>> + spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
>> +
>> + while (q->request_fn_active)
>> + msleep(10);
>> +
>> + eh_rc = q->reset_fn(q);
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
>> + blk_start_queue(q);
>> + spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
>> + }
>
> Some of the above code is similar to some of the code in
> scsi_internal_device_block() and scsi_internal_device_unblock(). Have
> you considered to avoid this duplication by introducing helpers in the
> block layer for blocking and unblocking queues?
>
Will do. Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
