On 6/14/16, 3:46 AM, "Bart Van Assche" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 06/14/2016 08:35 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
>> On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 12:05 -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>> On 06/09/2016 02:26 PM, Bryant G. Ly wrote:
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * ibmvscsis_modify_std_inquiry() - Modify STD Inquiry
>>>> + *
>>>> + * This function modifies the inquiry data prior to sending to initiator
>>>> + * so that we can support current AIX. Internally we are going to
>>>> + * add new ODM entries to support the emulation from LIO. This function
>>>> + * is temporary until those changes are done.
>>>> + */
>>>> +static void ibmvscsis_modify_std_inquiry(struct se_cmd *se_cmd)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct se_device *dev = se_cmd->se_dev;
>>>> + u32 cmd_len = se_cmd->data_length;
>>>> + u32 repl_len;
>>>> + unsigned char *buf = NULL;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (cmd_len <= 8)
>>>> + return;
>>>> +
>>>> + buf = transport_kmap_data_sg(se_cmd);
>>>> + if (buf) {
>>>> + repl_len = 8;
>>>> + if (cmd_len - 8 < repl_len)
>>>> + repl_len = cmd_len - 8;
>>>> + memcpy(&buf[8], "IBM ", repl_len);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (cmd_len > 16) {
>>>> + repl_len = 16;
>>>> + if (cmd_len - 16 < repl_len)
>>>> + repl_len = cmd_len - 16;
>>>> + if (dev->transport->get_device_type(dev) == TYPE_ROM)
>>>> + memcpy(&buf[16], "VOPTA ", repl_len);
>>>> + else
>>>> + memcpy(&buf[16], "3303 NVDISK", repl_len);
>>>> + }
>>>> + if (cmd_len > 32) {
>>>> + repl_len = 4;
>>>> + if (cmd_len - 32 < repl_len)
>>>> + repl_len = cmd_len - 32;
>>>> + memcpy(&buf[32], "0001", repl_len);
>>>> + }
>>>> + transport_kunmap_data_sg(se_cmd);
>>>> + }
>>>> +}
>>>
>>> Christoph Hellwig had asked you *not* to modify the INQUIRY response
>>> generated by the target core. Had you noticed that comment?
>>
>> Yeah, so I wanted to avoid having to add a new target_core_fabric_ops
>> API caller just for this special case, but there might not be another
>> choice..
>
>All what's needed is something like the (untested) patch below. As one
>can see no new function pointers have been added to target_core_fabric_ops.
>All that has been added are a few new data members. With the patch below
>ibmvscsis_modify_std_inquiry() can be left out and the target core will
>pick up the "IBM", "VOPTA", "3303 NVDISK" and "0001" strings through the
>target_core_fabric_ops instance in the ibmvscsis template. I think this is
>a much cleaner approach than keeping the ibmvscsis_modify_std_inquiry()
>function ...
>
>Bart.
>
>[PATCH] target: Make INQUIRY vendor, product ID and product revision
>configurable
>
>---
> drivers/target/target_core_configfs.c | 4 ++++
> drivers/target/target_core_spc.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++-----
> include/target/target_core_fabric.h | 6 ++++++
> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_configfs.c
>b/drivers/target/target_core_configfs.c
>index 2001005..32a74f7 100644
>--- a/drivers/target/target_core_configfs.c
>+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_configfs.c
>@@ -442,6 +442,10 @@ static int target_fabric_tf_ops_check(const struct
>target_core_fabric_ops *tfo)
> pr_err("Missing tfo->fabric_drop_tpg()\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>+ if (tfo->prod_id_cnt && !tfo->prod_id) {
>+ pr_err("Missing tfo->prod_id\n");
>+ return -EINVAL;
>+ }
>
> return 0;
> }
>diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_spc.c
>b/drivers/target/target_core_spc.c
>index 2a91ed3..32c8435 100644
>--- a/drivers/target/target_core_spc.c
>+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_spc.c
>@@ -66,6 +66,9 @@ spc_emulate_inquiry_std(struct se_cmd *cmd, unsigned char
>*buf)
> struct se_lun *lun = cmd->se_lun;
> struct se_device *dev = cmd->se_dev;
> struct se_session *sess = cmd->se_sess;
>+ struct se_portal_group *tpg = lun->lun_tpg;
>+ const struct target_core_fabric_ops *tfo = tpg->se_tpg_tfo;
>+ const char *vendor, *prod_id, *prod_rev;
>
> /* Set RMB (removable media) for tape devices */
> if (dev->transport->get_device_type(dev) == TYPE_TAPE)
>@@ -108,12 +111,21 @@ spc_emulate_inquiry_std(struct se_cmd *cmd, unsigned
>char *buf)
>
> buf[7] = 0x2; /* CmdQue=1 */
>
>- memcpy(&buf[8], "LIO-ORG ", 8);
>+ vendor = tfo->t10_vend_id ? : "LIO-ORG";
>+ memset(&buf[8], 0x20, 8);
>+ memcpy(&buf[8], vendor, min_t(int, strlen(vendor), 8));
>+ prod_id = dev->t10_wwn.model;
>+ if (tfo->prod_id) {
>+ int dev_type = dev->transport->get_device_type(dev);
>+
>+ if (dev_type < tfo->prod_id_cnt && tfo->prod_id[dev_type])
>+ prod_id = tfo->prod_id[dev_type];
>+ }
> memset(&buf[16], 0x20, 16);
>- memcpy(&buf[16], dev->t10_wwn.model,
>- min_t(size_t, strlen(dev->t10_wwn.model), 16));
>- memcpy(&buf[32], dev->t10_wwn.revision,
>- min_t(size_t, strlen(dev->t10_wwn.revision), 4));
>+ memcpy(&buf[16], prod_id, min_t(size_t, strlen(prod_id), 16));
>+ prod_rev = tfo->prod_rev ? : dev->t10_wwn.revision;
>+ memset(&buf[32], 0x20, 4);
>+ memcpy(&buf[32], prod_rev, min_t(size_t, strlen(prod_rev), 4));
> buf[4] = 31; /* Set additional length to 31 */
>
> return 0;
>diff --git a/include/target/target_core_fabric.h
>b/include/target/target_core_fabric.h
>index de44462..5a63000 100644
>--- a/include/target/target_core_fabric.h
>+++ b/include/target/target_core_fabric.h
>@@ -85,6 +85,12 @@ struct target_core_fabric_ops {
> void (*fabric_drop_np)(struct se_tpg_np *);
> int (*fabric_init_nodeacl)(struct se_node_acl *, const char *);
>
>+ /* For spc_emulate_inquiry_std() */
>+ const char *t10_vend_id;
>+ int prod_id_cnt; /* Number of elements in the prod_id array */
>+ const char **prod_id;
>+ const char *prod_rev;
>+
> struct configfs_attribute **tfc_discovery_attrs;
> struct configfs_attribute **tfc_wwn_attrs;
> struct configfs_attribute **tfc_tpg_base_attrs;
>
This worked great btw, thanks for helping out!
-Bryant
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
