On Mon, 19 Sep 2016, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> The driver has not seen any maintainer activity or other work that 
> wasn't tree wide conversion or clenaups in the entire history of the git 
> tree.

That could indicate mature code, absent maintainer etc. It doesn't justify 
or explain code removal.

In this case, no-one seems to have the hardware needed to test the code, 
and no-one appears willing to do the conversion to the scsi_host_alloc() 
API. I think this justification should appear in the commit message.

On that basis, I would remove these drivers along with scsi_register() 
itself. Is there some reason to remove them earlier? It messes up my patch 

Either way, you may add my
Acked-by: Finn Thain <fth...@telegraphics.com.au>
for the pas16, t128 and dtc patches if you like.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to