On Mon, 19 Sep 2016, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The driver has not seen any maintainer activity or other work that
> wasn't tree wide conversion or clenaups in the entire history of the git
That could indicate mature code, absent maintainer etc. It doesn't justify
or explain code removal.
In this case, no-one seems to have the hardware needed to test the code,
and no-one appears willing to do the conversion to the scsi_host_alloc()
API. I think this justification should appear in the commit message.
On that basis, I would remove these drivers along with scsi_register()
itself. Is there some reason to remove them earlier? It messes up my patch
Either way, you may add my
Acked-by: Finn Thain <fth...@telegraphics.com.au>
for the pas16, t128 and dtc patches if you like.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html