On 10/28/2016 01:21 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> From: "tang.junhui" <[email protected]>
> 
> scsi_device_put() is called when the conditions pg->rtpg_sdev!=NULL
> and queue_delayed_work() failure satisfied, actually it should be not
> to call because scsi_device_get() is not called previous in this scene.
> 
> Signed-off-by: tang.junhui <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c 
> b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c
> index 241829e..78081df 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c
> @@ -866,6 +866,7 @@ static void alua_rtpg_queue(struct alua_port_group *pg,
>                           struct alua_queue_data *qdata, bool force)
>  {
>       int start_queue = 0;
> +     int sdev_geted = 0;
>       unsigned long flags;
>       struct workqueue_struct *alua_wq = kaluad_wq;
>  
> @@ -884,6 +885,7 @@ static void alua_rtpg_queue(struct alua_port_group *pg,
>               kref_get(&pg->kref);
>               pg->rtpg_sdev = sdev;
>               scsi_device_get(sdev);
> +             sdev_geted = 1;
>               start_queue = 1;
>       } else if (!(pg->flags & ALUA_PG_RUN_RTPG) && force) {
>               pg->flags |= ALUA_PG_RUN_RTPG;
> @@ -901,7 +903,8 @@ static void alua_rtpg_queue(struct alua_port_group *pg,
>       if (start_queue &&
>           !queue_delayed_work(alua_wq, &pg->rtpg_work,
>                               msecs_to_jiffies(ALUA_RTPG_DELAY_MSECS))) {
> -             scsi_device_put(sdev);
> +             if (sdev_geted)
> +                     scsi_device_put(sdev);
>               kref_put(&pg->kref, release_port_group);
>       }
>  }

Hello Tang Junhui,

Personally I prefer the patch below because that patch does not introduce
a new variable. This is a patch I started testing four weeks ago and it has
survived all my ALUA tests so far. Please note that I do not know whether
my tests hit the !(pg->flags & ALUA_PG_RUNNING) code path.

From: Bart Van Assche <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 10:06:51 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] scsi_dh_alua: Fix a reference counting bug

Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c 
b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c
index 241829e..23835f7 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c
@@ -890,6 +890,7 @@ static void alua_rtpg_queue(struct alua_port_group *pg,
                /* Do not queue if the worker is already running */
                if (!(pg->flags & ALUA_PG_RUNNING)) {
                        kref_get(&pg->kref);
+                       sdev = NULL;
                        start_queue = 1;
                }
        }
@@ -901,7 +902,8 @@ static void alua_rtpg_queue(struct alua_port_group *pg,
        if (start_queue &&
            !queue_delayed_work(alua_wq, &pg->rtpg_work,
                                msecs_to_jiffies(ALUA_RTPG_DELAY_MSECS))) {
-               scsi_device_put(sdev);
+               if (sdev)
+                       scsi_device_put(sdev);
                kref_put(&pg->kref, release_port_group);
        }
 }
-- 
2.10.1


 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to