On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 10:15 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> The current medium access timeout counter will be increased for
> each command, so if there are enough failed commands we'll hit
> the medium access timeout for even a single failure.
This sentence describes multiple failed commands as a single failure.
That's confusing to me. Did you perhaps intend "for a single device
failure"?
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> index f2cafae..cec439c 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@
> static int scsi_eh_try_stu(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd);
> static int scsi_try_to_abort_cmd(struct scsi_host_template *,
> struct scsi_cmnd *);
> +static int scsi_eh_reset(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd);
>
> /* called with shost->host_lock held */
> void scsi_eh_wakeup(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
> @@ -249,6 +250,7 @@ int scsi_eh_scmd_add(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd, int eh_flag)
> if (scmd->eh_eflags & SCSI_EH_ABORT_SCHEDULED)
> eh_flag &= ~SCSI_EH_CANCEL_CMD;
> scmd->eh_eflags |= eh_flag;
> + scsi_eh_reset(scmd);
> list_add_tail(&scmd->eh_entry, &shost->eh_cmd_q);
> shost->host_failed++;
> scsi_eh_wakeup(shost);
> @@ -1107,7 +1109,19 @@ static int scsi_eh_action(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd, int
> rtn)
> if (!blk_rq_is_passthrough(scmd->request)) {
> struct scsi_driver *sdrv = scsi_cmd_to_driver(scmd);
> if (sdrv->eh_action)
> - rtn = sdrv->eh_action(scmd, rtn);
> + rtn = sdrv->eh_action(scmd, rtn, false);
> + }
> + return rtn;
> +}
> +
> +static int scsi_eh_reset(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
> +{
> + int rtn = SUCCESS;
> +
> + if (!blk_rq_is_passthrough(scmd->request)) {
> + struct scsi_driver *sdrv = scsi_cmd_to_driver(scmd);
> + if (sdrv->eh_action)
> + rtn = sdrv->eh_action(scmd, rtn, true);
> }
> return rtn;
> }
Can this function be moved up such that we don't need a new forward declaration?
> @@ -1689,18 +1689,28 @@ static int sd_pr_clear(struct block_device *bdev, u64
> key)
> * sd_eh_action - error handling callback
> * @scmd: sd-issued command that has failed
> * @eh_disp: The recovery disposition suggested by the midlayer
> + * @reset: Reset medium access counter
It seems to me that @reset does not trigger a reset of the medium access counter
but rather of the variable that prevents the medium access error counter to be
incremented?
> + * recovery).
> + * We have to be careful to count a medium access failure only once
> + * per SCSI EH run; there might be several timed out commands which
Did you perhaps intend "once per device per SCSI EH run"?
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.h
> @@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ struct scsi_disk {
> unsigned rc_basis: 2;
> unsigned zoned: 2;
> unsigned urswrz : 1;
> + unsigned medium_access_reset : 1;
The name of this new member is confusing to me. How about using the name
"ignore_medium_access_errors" instead? And since this is a boolean, how
about using true and false in assignments to this variable?
Thanks,
Bart.
