On 03/07/2017 04:05 PM, Don Brace wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Hannes Reinecke [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 4:55 AM >> To: Martin K. Petersen <[email protected]> >> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>; James Bottomley >> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; >> Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]>; Don Brace >> <[email protected]>; Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]> >> Subject: [PATCHv2] hpsa: expose enclosures >> >> EXTERNAL EMAIL >> >> >> Some servers have a built-in enclosure which will show up on the >> same bus as the internal physical devices. This patch fixes the >> driver to expose them. >> >> Cc: Don Brace <[email protected]> >> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]> > > Masking various SES targets is a conscious choice, not a design oversight. > So, I have to decline this patch., > Would you be okay with a module parameter for this? It really feels stupid to present the user with an enclosure device during boot (as hpsa presents all physical LUNs during booting), but not exporting it to the user.
Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage [email protected] +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
