----- Original Message -----
> From: "Fam Zheng" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <[email protected]>, [email protected], 
> [email protected], "James E.J.
> Bottomley" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, March 27, 2017 10:18:31 AM
> Subject: [PATCH] sd: Consider max_xfer_blocks if opt_xfer_blocks is unusable
> 
> If device reports a small max_xfer_blocks and a zero opt_xfer_blocks, we
> end up using BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS, which is wrong and r/w of that size
> may get error.
> 
> Fixes: ca369d51b3e ("block/sd: Fix device-imposed transfer length limits")
> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/sd.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> index fcfeddc..e2e21ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> @@ -2957,6 +2957,7 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
>               rw_max = logical_to_sectors(sdp, sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks);
>       } else
>               rw_max = BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS;
> +     rw_max = min_not_zero(rw_max, dev_max);
>  
>       /* Combine with controller limits */
>       q->limits.max_sectors = min(rw_max, queue_max_hw_sectors(q));
> --
> 2.9.3
> 
> 
Looks good to me and addresses the issue we faced.
FInal confirmation this change is OK to come from Martin or James.

Reviewed-by: Laurence Oberman <[email protected]>

Reply via email to