On 2017-03-28 01:11, [email protected] wrote:
From: Szymon Mielczarek <[email protected]>

This reverts commit 61e073590b82a539654626ecae91b8fab11db3f3.

The patch introduced redundant query retries as we already had such
mechanism provided with _retry functions.
Both ufshcd_read_desc and ufshcd_read_unit_desc_param functions
call ufshcd_query_descriptor_retry wrapper.

Signed-off-by: Szymon Mielczarek <[email protected]>
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 54 ++++++++---------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index 096e95b..3dddd13 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -3103,18 +3103,7 @@ static inline int ufshcd_read_power_desc(struct
ufs_hba *hba,
                                         u8 *buf,
                                         u32 size)
 {
-       int err = 0;
-       int retries;
-
-       for (retries = QUERY_REQ_RETRIES; retries > 0; retries--) {
-               /* Read descriptor*/
-               err = ufshcd_read_desc(hba, QUERY_DESC_IDN_POWER, 0, buf, size);
-               if (!err)
-                       break;
-               dev_dbg(hba->dev, "%s: error %d retrying\n", __func__, err);
-       }
-
-       return err;
+       return ufshcd_read_desc(hba, QUERY_DESC_IDN_POWER, 0, buf, size);
 }

static int ufshcd_read_device_desc(struct ufs_hba *hba, u8 *buf, u32 size)
@@ -4272,24 +4261,16 @@ static void ufshcd_set_queue_depth(struct
scsi_device *sdev)
 {
        int ret = 0;
        u8 lun_qdepth;
-       int retries;
        struct ufs_hba *hba;

        hba = shost_priv(sdev->host);

        lun_qdepth = hba->nutrs;
-       for (retries = QUERY_REQ_RETRIES; retries > 0; retries--) {
-               /* Read descriptor*/
-               ret = ufshcd_read_unit_desc_param(hba,
-                                 ufshcd_scsi_to_upiu_lun(sdev->lun),
-                                 UNIT_DESC_PARAM_LU_Q_DEPTH,
-                                 &lun_qdepth,
-                                 sizeof(lun_qdepth));
-               if (!ret || ret == -ENOTSUPP)
-                       break;
-
-               dev_dbg(hba->dev, "%s: error %d retrying\n", __func__, ret);
-       }
+       ret = ufshcd_read_unit_desc_param(hba,
+                                         ufshcd_scsi_to_upiu_lun(sdev->lun),
+                                         UNIT_DESC_PARAM_LU_Q_DEPTH,
+                                         &lun_qdepth,
+                                         sizeof(lun_qdepth));

        /* Some WLUN doesn't support unit descriptor */
        if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP)
@@ -5960,24 +5941,6 @@ static u32
ufshcd_find_max_sup_active_icc_level(struct ufs_hba *hba,
        return icc_level;
 }

-static int ufshcd_set_icc_levels_attr(struct ufs_hba *hba, u32 icc_level)
-{
-       int ret = 0;
-       int retries;
-
-       for (retries = QUERY_REQ_RETRIES; retries > 0; retries--) {
-               /* write attribute */
-               ret = ufshcd_query_attr(hba, UPIU_QUERY_OPCODE_WRITE_ATTR,
-                       QUERY_ATTR_IDN_ACTIVE_ICC_LVL, 0, 0, &icc_level);
-               if (!ret)
-                       break;
-
-               dev_dbg(hba->dev, "%s: failed with error %d\n", __func__, ret);
-       }
-
-       return ret;
-}
-
 static void ufshcd_init_icc_levels(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 {
        int ret;
@@ -5998,8 +5961,9 @@ static void ufshcd_init_icc_levels(struct ufs_hba *hba)
        dev_dbg(hba->dev, "%s: setting icc_level 0x%x",
                        __func__, hba->init_prefetch_data.icc_level);

-       ret = ufshcd_set_icc_levels_attr(hba,
-                                hba->init_prefetch_data.icc_level);
+       ret = ufshcd_query_attr_retry(hba, UPIU_QUERY_OPCODE_WRITE_ATTR,
+               QUERY_ATTR_IDN_ACTIVE_ICC_LVL, 0, 0,
+               &hba->init_prefetch_data.icc_level);

        if (ret)
                dev_err(hba->dev,

Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Subhash Jadavani <[email protected]>

--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Reply via email to