On 2017-03-28 06:49, kusumi.tomoh...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Tomohiro Kusumi <tkus...@tuxera.com>Not much reason to use ARRAY_SIZE() when we know it's for a C string. Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Kusumi <tkus...@tuxera.com> --- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c index 109a762..790c19c 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c @@ -7880,7 +7880,7 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, void __iomem *mmio_base, unsigned int irq) INIT_WORK(&hba->clk_scaling.resume_work, ufshcd_clk_scaling_resume_work); - snprintf(wq_name, ARRAY_SIZE(wq_name), "ufs_clkscaling_%d", + snprintf(wq_name, sizeof(wq_name), "ufs_clkscaling_%d", host->host_no); hba->clk_scaling.workq = create_singlethread_workqueue(wq_name);
Looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Subhash Jadavani <subha...@codeaurora.org> -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
