> On Apr 13, 2017, at 1:27 AM, Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnel...@au1.ibm.com> > wrote: > > On 13/04/17 05:14, Uma Krishnan wrote: >> From: "Matthew R. Ochs" <mro...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >> >> An EEH during probe can lead to a crash as the recovery thread races >> with the probe thread. To avoid this issue, introduce new states to >> fence out EEH recovery until probe has completed. Also ensure the reset >> wait queue is flushed during device removal to avoid orphaned threads. >> >> Signed-off-by: Matthew R. Ochs <mro...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >> Signed-off-by: Uma Krishnan <ukri...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > The use of the term "fence" in the commit message might be a bit confusing > given how the term is already used in the context of EEH :)
Hi Andrew, I agree that it could be a bit misleading but think the commit message is descriptive enough to avoid confusion. If you feel strongly about it I'm happy to reword the commit. -matt
