在 2017/6/14 21:08, John Garry 写道:
> On 14/06/2017 10:04, wangyijing wrote:
>>>> static void notify_ha_event(struct sas_ha_struct *sas_ha, enum ha_event
>>>> event)
>>>> >> {
>>>> >> + struct sas_ha_event *ev;
>>>> >> +
>>>> >> BUG_ON(event >= HA_NUM_EVENTS);
>>>> >>
>>>> >> - sas_queue_event(event, &sas_ha->pending,
>>>> >> - &sas_ha->ha_events[event].work, sas_ha);
>>>> >> + ev = kzalloc(sizeof(*ev), GFP_ATOMIC);
>>>> >> + if (!ev)
>>>> >> + return;
>>> > GFP_ATOMIC allocations can fail and then no events will be queued *and* we
>>> > don't report the error back to the caller.
>>> >
>> Yes, it's really a problem, but I don't find a better solution, do you have
>> some suggestion ?
>>
>
> Dan raised an issue with this approach, regarding a malfunctioning PHY which
> spews out events. I still don't think we're handling it safely. Here's the
> suggestion:
> - each asd_sas_phy owns a finite-sized pool of events
> - when the event pool becomes exhausted, libsas stops queuing events
> (obviously) and disables the PHY in the LLDD
> - upon attempting to re-enable the PHY from sysfs, libsas first checks that
> the pool is still not exhausted
>
> If you cannot find a good solution, then let us know and we can help.
Hi John and Dan, what's event you found on malfunctioning PHY, if the event is
PORTE_BROADCAST_RCVD, since
every PORTE_BROADCAST_RCVD libsas always call sas_revalidate_domain(), what
about keeping a broadcast waiting(not queued in workqueue)
and discard others. If the event is other types, things may become knotty.
>
> John
>
>
> .
>
