On 2017-07-05 09:49 AM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
SG_DXFER_FROM_DEV transfers do not have a dxferp as we set it to NULL,
but must have a length bigger than 0. This fixes a regression introduced
by commit 28676d869bbb ("scsi: sg: check for valid direction before
starting the request")

It is not clear to me that dxferp is set to NULL for the newer sg_v3
interface. In the sg.c source of lk 4.12.0 around line 654 (in the
sg_write(...) function) only the older interface passes through; the
newer interface bypasses that section with a 'return sg_new_write(...)'
on line 606.

Can you check your patch with one of the utilities from sg3_utils
such as sg_inq which will use SG_DXFER_FROM_DEV with the newer
interface?


BTW I'm not sure why dxferp is set to NULL for SG_DXFER_FROM_DEV
transfers; perhaps some magic done by the block layer. Maybe a
comment in the code (e.g. on line 654) would help.

Also sg_is_valid_dxfer() is only called once and is more complex
than it looks; so perhaps it could be inlined back in
sg_common_write().

Doug Gilbert

Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumsh...@suse.de>
Fixes: 28676d869bbb ("scsi: sg: check for valid direction before starting the 
request")
Reported-by: Chris Clayton <chris2...@googlemail.com>
Tested-by: Chris Clayton <chris2...@googlemail.com>
Cc: Doug Gilbert <dgilb...@interlog.com>
---
  drivers/scsi/sg.c | 5 ++++-
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sg.c b/drivers/scsi/sg.c
index 21225d62b0c1..3c91593260aa 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sg.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sg.c
@@ -758,8 +758,11 @@ static bool sg_is_valid_dxfer(sg_io_hdr_t *hp)
                if (hp->dxferp || hp->dxfer_len > 0)
                        return false;
                return true;
-       case SG_DXFER_TO_DEV:
        case SG_DXFER_FROM_DEV:
+               if (hp->dxferp || hp->dxfer_len < 0)
+                       return false;
+               return true;
+       case SG_DXFER_TO_DEV:
        case SG_DXFER_TO_FROM_DEV:
                if (!hp->dxferp || hp->dxfer_len == 0)
                        return false;


Reply via email to