On Tuesday 08 August 2017 09:20 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Hi Koshon,
> On 2017-08-08 17:39, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> Hi,
>> On Friday 04 August 2017 12:18 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>>> Refactoring the qcom-ufs phy and host controller code to move
>>> further towards the generic phy usage. Right now the qcom-ufs exports
>>> a bunch of APIs that are used by the host controller to initialize
>>> the phy.
>>> With this patch series, we populate the phy_init() which was a no-op
>>> earlier. The host controller then calls the phy_init() at the designated
>>> place rather than doing it invariably in ufs_hcd_init().
>>> As part of this series, we introduce phy modes for ufs phy.
>>> The M-PHY has two data rates defined for each generations (Gears) -
>>> Rate A and Rate B. These can serve as the two modes of ufs HS phy.
>>> Host controller can direct the phy to set the respective configurations
>>> based on the phy modes.
>>> The patch-series has been tested with necessary dt patches on db820c.
>> Can the first 3 patches go independently of the other 2 or should all this be
>> merged together?
> The first 3 patches are independent, but the next 2 patches depend on those 3
> for functionality.
> I would prefer all to go in one tree. If you want to pull these in the phy 
> tree,
> I will request Subhash/Martin to ack the patches.

sure, that should be fine!


Reply via email to