On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 05:28:16PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 11:08 +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > Looks I replied or clarified all your questions/comments on this > > patchset. > > No, you have not addressed all my comments, you know that you have not > addressed all my comments so you should not have written that you have
I do not know. > addressed all my comments. This patch series not only introduces ugly > changes in the request queue freeze mechanism but it also introduces an > unacceptable race condition between blk_get_request() and request queue > cleanup. So what is the race? Could you reply in original thread? > > BTW, you don't have to spend more time on this patch series. I have > implemented an alternative and much cleaner approach to fix SCSI device > suspend. I'm currently testing that patch series. You do not understand the issue at all, it is not only related with suspend. Please take a look at scsi_execute(), each request run via scsi_execute() need to be dispatched successfully even when SCSI device is quiesced. -- Ming
