> On Feb 22, 2018, at 10:28 PM, Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnel...@au1.ibm.com> 
> wrote:
> On 23/02/18 09:22, Uma Krishnan wrote:
>> Add initial infrastructure to support a new cxlflash transport, OpenCXL.
>> Claim a dependency on OpenCXL (OCXL) and add a new file, ocxl_hw.c, which
>> will host the backend routines that are specific to OpenCXL.
>> Signed-off-by: Uma Krishnan <ukri...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Is it necessary to depend on OCXL in all cases? IMHO it should be possible to 
> build a cxl-only version without ocxl, though I don't feel very strongly on 
> this.

I thought through this and did not feel it is necessary to distinguish right 
now. I will look at adding this in the future. Thanks Andrew !

Reply via email to