On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 03:16:57PM +0100, John Garry wrote: > On 08/08/2018 12:56, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > We accidentally return success instead of -ENODEV on this error path. > > Sorry to nitpick, but - as I see - the only way for > sas_domain_attach_transport() to fail is if the kzalloc() in > sas_attach_transport() fails, so should this be -ENOMEM? Other drivers > return this error code for this scenario. >
Huh... I was so sure I looked up other callers to see what people normally return... Anyway, you're right. Let me resend. regards, dan carpenter
