Ok thanks.
Will test and those as the first 2 patches in the series.

Thanks a lot,
Avri

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2018 8:15 PM
> To: Avri Altman <avri.alt...@wdc.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>; Johannes Thumshirn
> <jthumsh...@suse.de>; Hannes Reinecke <h...@suse.com>; Bart Van Assche
> <bart.vanass...@wdc.com>; James E.J. Bottomley
> <j...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Martin K. Petersen
> <martin.peter...@oracle.com>; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; Stanislav Nijnikov
> <stanislav.nijni...@wdc.com>; Avi Shchislowski
> <avi.shchislow...@wdc.com>; Alex Lemberg <alex.lemb...@wdc.com>;
> Subhash Jadavani <subha...@codeaurora.org>; Vinayak Holikatti
> <vinayak.holika...@wdc.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] scsi: ufs: Add fill task management request
> 
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 07:08:50PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 03:53:41PM +0000, Avri Altman wrote:
> > > But on the other hand, task management request and response UPIUs
> > > are honorable members of the ufs spec (JEDEC 220C paragraphs 10.7.6 &
> 10.7.7).
> > > and indeed they lives in ufs.h, where they should.
> >
> > There is no other use anywhere.  Remember that there is no need to
> > have C data structure match what is in the spec, in fact doing so
> > often leads to worse code, which is why we often avoid it.
> >
> > I'll send out a little series (untested) to show how I'd like to see
> > this task menagement code look like.
> 
> Ok, the wifi at the meeting I'm at right now doesn't allow sending
> mail, so here are the patches as an attachment.

Reply via email to