Finn,
> This looks wrong to me. I think you've just prevented all START STOP > commands sent to logical volumes from reaching > > return ((*ha->func.issue) (ha, scb)); > > I think a better patch is to add a "fall though" comment not a "break" > statement. (I no longer have access to a ServeRAID board so I can't > test.) When I looked at this a few days ago, it seemed that the fallthrough to the TUR/INQUIRY case statement was accidental and that the intent was to quickly complete START_STOP unit (which probably doesn't make much sense for a RAID device anyway). See the case statements above for another fast exit scenario. Sadly I have no way to test this. It just stuck out like a false positive in Gustavo's fallthrough markup patch. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
