On 1/19/19 1:56 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 10:48:15AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
It's UFS that totally buggy, if you look at its queuecommand, it does:
if (!down_read_trylock(&hba->clk_scaling_lock))
return SCSI_MLQUEUE_HOST_BUSY;
UFS either needs to get fixed up, or we'll want a way to do something like
the below.
I think the right answer is to just revert the offending patch instead
of papering over it in the SCSI code.
.
Hi Christoph,
Which patch are you referring to?
Thanks,
Bart.
