Doing a runtime pm get/put as part of ufs_qcom_testbus_config()
seems completely unnecessary, since this is called only early
during ufs_qcom_init() when the runtime operations are not
completely setup for ufs runtime suspend/resume to even work.

Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
index 3aeadb14aae1..3590741eea2f 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
@@ -1558,7 +1558,6 @@ int ufs_qcom_testbus_config(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
        }
        mask <<= offset;
 
-       pm_runtime_get_sync(host->hba->dev);
        ufshcd_hold(host->hba, false);
        ufshcd_rmwl(host->hba, TEST_BUS_SEL,
                    (u32)host->testbus.select_major << 19,
@@ -1573,7 +1572,6 @@ int ufs_qcom_testbus_config(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
         */
        mb();
        ufshcd_release(host->hba);
-       pm_runtime_put_sync(host->hba->dev);
 
        return 0;
 }
-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

Reply via email to