On 2019-10-02 08:41, Martin Wilck wrote: > From: Martin Wilck <[email protected]> > > Hello Martin, > > this patch fixes two issues in patch 02/14 in Himanshu's latest > qla2xxx series ("qla2xxx: Bug fixes for the driver") from > Sept. 12th, which you applied onto 5.4/scsi-fixes already. > See https://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=156951704106671&w=2 > > I'm assuming that Himanshu and Quinn are working on another > series of fixes, in which case that should take precedence > over this patch. I just wanted to provide this so that the > already known problems are fixed in your tree. > > v2: check loop condition only once (Bart van Assche) > > Commit message follows: > > Fix two issues with the previously submitted patch > "qla2xxx: Optimize NPIV tear down process": a missing negation > in a wait_event_timeout() condition, and a missing loop end > condition. > > Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck <[email protected]> > Fixes: f5187b7d1ac6 ("scsi: qla2xxx: Optimize NPIV tear down process") > --- > drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_mid.c | 8 +++++--- > drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_os.c | 8 +++++--- > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_mid.c b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_mid.c > index 6afad68e5ba2..238240984bc1 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_mid.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_mid.c > @@ -76,9 +76,11 @@ qla24xx_deallocate_vp_id(scsi_qla_host_t *vha) > * ensures no active vp_list traversal while the vport is removed > * from the queue) > */ > - for (i = 0; i < 10 && atomic_read(&vha->vref_count); i++) > - wait_event_timeout(vha->vref_waitq, > - atomic_read(&vha->vref_count), HZ); > + for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) { > + if (wait_event_timeout(vha->vref_waitq, > + !atomic_read(&vha->vref_count), HZ) > 0) > + break; > + } > > spin_lock_irqsave(&ha->vport_slock, flags); > if (atomic_read(&vha->vref_count)) { > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_os.c b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_os.c > index 6e627e521562..ee5b6cba9872 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_os.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_os.c > @@ -1119,9 +1119,11 @@ qla2x00_wait_for_sess_deletion(scsi_qla_host_t *vha) > > qla2x00_mark_all_devices_lost(vha, 0); > > - for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) > - wait_event_timeout(vha->fcport_waitQ, test_fcport_count(vha), > - HZ); > + for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) { > + if (wait_event_timeout(vha->fcport_waitQ, > + test_fcport_count(vha), HZ) > 0) > + break; > + } > > flush_workqueue(vha->hw->wq); > }
This patch looks fine to me although I'm still wondering what the difference is between a loop with wait_event_timeout() calls and a single wait_event_timeout() call with a longer timeout? Thanks, Bart.
