In a recent message, Alan Cox said: > If you want to make this work even better run a lot of 2.0 binaries on 2.2, > check they all still work. If not find out why. Similarly people should be I don't understand why Linux is taking so much flack here. Going from 2.0 to 2.2 is a MAJOR CHANGE. Hell, even Solaris 2.4 programs don't run properly under Solaris 2.6 (and not even under 2.5.1 - try out the Lotus Notes 4.0 client, for example). Even with the ..x patches, the user has a choice; backwards compatibility with BUGS, or a bugless mode with the possibility of an unfortunate binary side effect. Heh, Alan, for each of your patches have a kernel compile configuration option "enable XYZ bug mode for compatibility" :-) And anyway, this isn't linux-scsi related... rgds Stephen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Kernel interface changes (was Re: cdrecord problems on ... Monty
- Re: Kernel interface changes (was Re: cdrecord pro... Derek Atkins
- Re: Kernel interface changes (was Re: cdrecord... Alan Cox
- Re: Kernel interface changes (was Re: cdre... Edwin Foo
- Re: Kernel interface changes (was Re: ... Alan Cox
- Re: Kernel interface changes (was... Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: Kernel interface changes ... Alan Cox
- Re: Kernel interface chan... Derek Atkins
- Re: Kernel interface changes (was... Stephen Harris
- Re: Kernel interface changes ... Kev
- Re: Kernel interface changes ... Bill Cattey
- Re: Kernel interface changes (was Re: ... yodaiken
- Re: Kernel interface changes (was... Kev
- Re: Kernel interface changes ... Edwin Foo
- Re: Kernel interface changes ... Robert Thorncrantz
- Re: Kernel interface chan... Derek Atkins
- Re: Kernel interface changes (was... Arvind Sankar
- Re: Kernel interface changes (was... Khimenko Victor
- Re: Kernel interface changes ... Arvind Sankar