Eric Youngdale wrote: > I am not sure what you would want to do if the upper level driver (i.e. > sg) wanted an even larger timeout. My guess is that you take the maximum > value of what the upper level driver wants and the value in SDpnt. That sounds right to me. -- Doug Ledford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://people.redhat.com/dledford Please check my web site for aic7xxx updates/answers before e-mailing me about problems - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Discussion to change SD_TIMEOUT in the sd driver Boerner, Brian
- Re: Discussion to change SD_TIMEOUT in the sd driver Doug Ledford
- Re: Discussion to change SD_TIMEOUT in the sd dri... Eric Youngdale
- Re: Discussion to change SD_TIMEOUT in the sd... Doug Ledford
- Re: Discussion to change SD_TIMEOUT in the sd dri... Robin T. Miller
- Re: Discussion to change SD_TIMEOUT in the sd... Ishikawa
- Re: Discussion to change SD_TIMEOUT in th... Doug Ledford
- Re: Discussion to change SD_TIMEOUT in the sd... Doug Ledford
- Re: Discussion to change SD_TIMEOUT in the sd... Eddie Williams
- Re: Discussion to change SD_TIMEOUT in the sd driver sjbuller
- Re: Discussion to change SD_TIMEOUT in the sd driver sjbuller
- Re: Discussion to change SD_TIMEOUT in the sd driver Stanley Wu
- Re: Discussion to change SD_TIMEOUT in the sd driver dhjohnso
