linux-security-module

Messages by Date

2007/11/06 Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser Adrian Bunk
2007/11/05 Re: Problem with accessing namespace_sem from LSM. Toshiharu Harada
2007/11/05 Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser Adrian Bunk
2007/11/05 Re: Defense in depth: LSM *modules*, not a static interface Cliffe
2007/11/05 Problem with accessing namespace_sem from LSM. Tetsuo Handa
2007/11/05 Re: Problem with accessing namespace_sem from LSM. Arjan van de Ven
2007/11/05 Re: Defense in depth: LSM *modules*, not a static interface Crispin Cowan
2007/11/05 Re: [RFC PATCH] 64-bit-capabilities Serge E. Hallyn
2007/11/05 Re: File descriptor object capability LSM module. Feasability? Peter Dolding
2007/11/05 Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser Ahmed S. Darwish
2007/11/05 Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser Tetsuo Handa
2007/11/05 File descriptor object capability LSM module. Feasability? Rob Meijer
2007/11/05 Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser Linus Torvalds
2007/11/05 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Serge E. Hallyn
2007/11/05 Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser Ahmed S. Darwish
2007/11/04 [RFC PATCH] 64-bit-capabilities Andrew Morgan
2007/11/04 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Andrew Morgan
2007/11/04 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface Crispin Cowan
2007/11/04 [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser(2) Ahmed S. Darwish
2007/11/04 Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser Ahmed S. Darwish
2007/11/04 Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser Casey Schaufler
2007/11/04 Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser Ahmed S. Darwish
2007/11/04 Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser Pavel Machek
2007/11/03 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Peter Dolding
2007/11/03 Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser Ahmed S. Darwish
2007/11/03 Re: [PATCH] file capabilities: allow sigcont within session (v2) Andrew Morgan
2007/11/03 Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser Kyle Moffett
2007/11/03 [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser Ahmed S. Darwish
2007/11/02 [PATCH] NetLabel: Introduce a new kernel configuration API for NetLabel - For 2.6.24-rc-git11 - Smack Version 10 Casey Schaufler
2007/11/02 Re: [PATCH] Smackv9: Use a stateful parser for parsing Smack rules Ahmed S. Darwish
2007/11/02 Re: [AppArmor 19/45] Add struct vfsmount parameters to vfs_rename() Peter Zijlstra
2007/11/02 Re: [AppArmor 19/45] Add struct vfsmount parameters to vfs_rename() Bodo Eggert
2007/11/01 Re: [PATCH] file capabilities: allow sigcont within session (v2) Theodore Tso
2007/11/01 Re: [PATCH 2/2] VFS: Reorder vfs_getxattr to avoid unnecessary calls to the LSM Serge E. Hallyn
2007/11/01 Re: [PATCH 1/2] VFS/Security: Rework inode_getsecurity and callers to return resulting buffer Serge E. Hallyn
2007/11/01 Re: [PATCH 1/2] VFS/Security: Rework inode_getsecurity and callers to return resulting buffer James Morris
2007/11/01 Re: [PATCH 2/2] VFS: Reorder vfs_getxattr to avoid unnecessary calls to the LSM James Morris
2007/11/01 Re: [PATCH] file capabilities: allow sigcont within session (v2) Theodore Tso
2007/11/01 Re: [PATCH] 2.6.23: Filesystem capabilities 0.17 Olaf Dietsche
2007/11/01 Re: [PATCH] Smackv9: Use a stateful parser for parsing Smack rules Jan Engelhardt
2007/11/01 RE: Possible missing security checks in usbfs? Tan, Lin
2007/11/01 [PATCH] Smackv9: Use a stateful parser for parsing Smack rules Ahmed S. Darwish
2007/11/01 Re: Possible missing security checks in usbfs? Greg KH
2007/11/01 RE: Possible missing security checks in usbfs? Tan, Lin
2007/11/01 [PATCH 2/2] VFS: Reorder vfs_getxattr to avoid unnecessary calls to the LSM David P. Quigley
2007/11/01 [PATCH 1/2] VFS/Security: Rework inode_getsecurity and callers to return resulting buffer David P. Quigley
2007/11/01 [PATCH 0/2] getsecurity/vfs_getxattr cleanup V2 David P. Quigley
2007/11/01 Re: [PATCH] file capabilities: allow sigcont within session (v2) Serge E. Hallyn
2007/11/01 Re: [PATCH] file capabilities: allow sigcont within session (v2) Stephen Smalley
2007/11/01 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) David Newall
2007/11/01 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Jan Engelhardt
2007/11/01 Re: [PATCH RFC] Alternative 64-bit capability patch Andrew Morgan
2007/10/31 Re: [PATCH] file capabilities: allow sigcont within session (v2) Andrew Morgan
2007/10/31 Re: Possible missing security checks in usbfs? Greg KH
2007/10/31 Re: [PATCH 1/2] VFS/Security: Rework inode_getsecurity and callers to return resulting buffer James Morris
2007/10/31 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Peter Dolding
2007/10/31 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Casey Schaufler
2007/10/31 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Peter Dolding
2007/10/31 Re: [PATCH] file capabilities: allow sigcont within session (v2) Andrew Morgan
2007/10/31 Possible missing security checks in usbfs? Tan, Lin
2007/10/31 [PATCH] file capabilities: allow sigcont within session (v2) Serge E. Hallyn
2007/10/31 Re: [PATCH 1/2] VFS/Security: Rework inode_getsecurity and callers to return resulting buffer David P. Quigley
2007/10/31 Re: [PATCH RFC] Alternative 64-bit capability patch Serge E. Hallyn
2007/10/31 Re: [PATCH] 2.6.23: Filesystem capabilities 0.17 Serge E. Hallyn
2007/10/31 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Toshiharu Harada
2007/10/31 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Peter Dolding
2007/10/30 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Crispin Cowan
2007/10/30 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) david
2007/10/30 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Casey Schaufler
2007/10/30 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Peter Dolding
2007/10/30 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) david
2007/10/30 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Peter Dolding
2007/10/30 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Jan Engelhardt
2007/10/30 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Casey Schaufler
2007/10/30 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Jan Engelhardt
2007/10/30 Re: eradicating out of tree modules Greg KH
2007/10/30 Re: [PATCH] Version 3 (2.6.23-rc8) Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel Casey Schaufler
2007/10/30 Re: Defense in depth: LSM *modules*, not a static interface Casey Schaufler
2007/10/30 Re: eradicating out of tree modules linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2007/10/30 Re: eradicating out of tree modules Xavier Bestel
2007/10/30 Re: Defense in depth: LSM *modules*, not a static interface Simon Arlott
2007/10/30 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Bernd Petrovitsch
2007/10/30 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Jan Engelhardt
2007/10/30 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Toshiharu Harada
2007/10/30 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Crispin Cowan
2007/10/30 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Jan Engelhardt
2007/10/30 Re: Defense in depth: LSM *modules*, not a static interface Crispin Cowan
2007/10/30 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Toshiharu Harada
2007/10/30 Re: Defense in depth: LSM *modules*, not a static interface Cliffe
2007/10/29 Re: Defense in depth: LSM *modules*, not a static interface Al Viro
2007/10/29 Defense in depth: LSM *modules*, not a static interface Cliffe
2007/10/29 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Peter Dolding
2007/10/29 Re: [PATCH] Version 3 (2.6.23-rc8) Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel Kazuki Omo(Company)
2007/10/29 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Toshiharu Harada
2007/10/29 Re: Out-of-tree modules [was: Linux Security *Module* Framework] Jan Engelhardt
2007/10/29 Re: Out-of-tree modules [was: Linux Security *Module* Framework] Lee Revell
2007/10/29 Re: eradicating out of tree modules Tilman Schmidt
2007/10/29 Out-of-tree modules [was: Linux Security *Module* Framework] Jan Engelhardt
2007/10/29 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Casey Schaufler
2007/10/29 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Crispin Cowan
2007/10/29 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Rob Meijer
2007/10/29 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Peter Dolding
2007/10/29 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Crispin Cowan
2007/10/29 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Rob Meijer
2007/10/29 [PATCH RFC] Alternative 64-bit capability patch Andrew Morgan
2007/10/28 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Arjan van de Ven
2007/10/28 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Peter Dolding
2007/10/28 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Alan Cox
2007/10/28 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Crispin Cowan
2007/10/28 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework Jan Engelhardt
2007/10/28 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework Tilman Schmidt
2007/10/28 Re: eradicating out of tree modules Adrian Bunk
2007/10/28 RE: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Hua Zhong
2007/10/28 Re: eradicating out of tree modules Tilman Schmidt
2007/10/28 RE: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Hua Zhong
2007/10/28 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Pavel Machek
2007/10/28 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Pavel Machek
2007/10/28 Re: eradicating out of tree modules Tilman Schmidt
2007/10/28 Re: eradicating out of tree modules Simon Arlott
2007/10/28 Re: eradicating out of tree modules Stefan Richter
2007/10/28 Re: [AppArmor 00/45] AppArmor security module overview Andreas Gruenbacher
2007/10/28 Re: [PATCH 2/2] Version 9 (2.6.24-rc1) Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel Ahmed S. Darwish
2007/10/28 Re: eradicating out of tree modules Tilman Schmidt
2007/10/28 Re: eradicating out of tree modules Stefan Richter
2007/10/27 Re: [PATCH 2/2] Version 9 (2.6.24-rc1) Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel Casey Schaufler
2007/10/27 Re: eradicating out of tree modules (was: Linux Security *Module* Framework) Adrian Bunk
2007/10/27 Re: eradicating out of tree modules (was: : Linux Security *Module* Framework) Adrian Bunk
2007/10/27 Re: [PATCH 2/2] Version 9 (2.6.24-rc1) Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel Al Viro
2007/10/27 Re: [PATCH 2/2] Version 9 (2.6.24-rc1) Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel Ahmed S. Darwish
2007/10/27 Re: [AppArmor 00/45] AppArmor security module overview Christoph Hellwig
2007/10/27 Re: [PATCH 2/2] Version 9 (2.6.24-rc1) Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel Casey Schaufler
2007/10/27 Re: [PATCH 0/2] Version 9 (2.6.24-rc1) Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel Casey Schaufler
2007/10/27 Re: eradicating out of tree modules Stefan Richter
2007/10/27 Re: [PATCH 2/2] Version 9 (2.6.24-rc1) Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel Ahmed S. Darwish
2007/10/27 eradicating out of tree modules (was: : Linux Security *Module* Framework) Tilman Schmidt
2007/10/27 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface Tetsuo Handa
2007/10/27 eradicating out of tree modules (was: Linux Security *Module* Framework) Tilman Schmidt
2007/10/27 Re: [PATCH 0/2] Version 9 (2.6.24-rc1) Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel Joshua Brindle
2007/10/27 Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] capabilities: implement 64-bit capabilities (v2) Andrew Morgan
2007/10/26 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Adrian Bunk
2007/10/26 Re: [AppArmor 00/45] AppArmor security module overview Arjan van de Ven
2007/10/26 Re: [AppArmor 00/45] AppArmor security module overview Crispin Cowan
2007/10/26 Re: [PATCH 1/2] VFS/Security: Rework inode_getsecurity and callers to return resulting buffer James Morris
2007/10/26 Re: [AppArmor 32/45] Enable LSM hooks to distinguish operations on file descriptors from operations on pathnames Andreas Gruenbacher
2007/10/26 Re: [AppArmor 00/45] AppArmor security module overview Andreas Gruenbacher
2007/10/26 Re: [AppArmor 00/45] AppArmor security module overview Arjan van de Ven
2007/10/26 Re: [AppArmor 32/45] Enable LSM hooks to distinguish operations on file descriptors from operations on pathnames Miklos Szeredi
2007/10/26 Re: [AppArmor 00/45] AppArmor security module overview Andreas Gruenbacher
2007/10/26 Re: [PATCH 2/2] Version 9 (2.6.24-rc1) Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel Stephen Smalley
2007/10/26 Re: [AppArmor 19/45] Add struct vfsmount parameters to vfs_rename() Al Viro
2007/10/26 Re: [AppArmor 32/45] Enable LSM hooks to distinguish operations on file descriptors from operations on pathnames Andreas Gruenbacher
2007/10/26 Re: [AppArmor 00/45] AppArmor security module overview Arjan van de Ven
2007/10/26 Re: [AppArmor 32/45] Enable LSM hooks to distinguish operations on file descriptors from operations on pathnames John Johansen
2007/10/26 Re: [AppArmor 00/45] AppArmor security module overview John Johansen
2007/10/26 Re: [AppArmor 35/45] Allow permission functions to tell between parent and leaf checks John Johansen
2007/10/26 Re: [AppArmor 19/45] Add struct vfsmount parameters to vfs_rename() John Johansen
2007/10/26 Re: [PATCH 1/2] VFS/Security: Rework inode_getsecurity and callers to return resulting buffer David P. Quigley
2007/10/26 Re: [PATCH 1/2] VFS/Security: Rework inode_getsecurity and callers to return resulting buffer Serge E. Hallyn
2007/10/26 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Simon Arlott
2007/10/26 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Greg KH
2007/10/26 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Greg KH
2007/10/26 Re: [PATCH 1/2] VFS/Security: Rework inode_getsecurity and callers to return resulting buffer David P. Quigley
2007/10/26 Re: [PATCH 1/2] VFS/Security: Rework inode_getsecurity and callers to return resulting buffer Serge E. Hallyn
2007/10/26 Re: [PATCH 1/2] VFS/Security: Rework inode_getsecurity and callers to return resulting buffer David P. Quigley
2007/10/26 Re: [PATCH 1/2] VFS/Security: Rework inode_getsecurity and callers to return resulting buffer David P. Quigley
2007/10/26 Re: [PATCH 1/2] VFS/Security: Rework inode_getsecurity and callers to return resulting buffer David P. Quigley
2007/10/26 Re: [PATCH 1/2] VFS/Security: Rework inode_getsecurity and callers to return resulting buffer Stephen Smalley
2007/10/26 Re: [PATCH 1/2] VFS/Security: Rework inode_getsecurity and callers to return resulting buffer Serge E. Hallyn
2007/10/26 Re: [PATCH 1/2] VFS/Security: Rework inode_getsecurity and callers to return resulting buffer Serge E. Hallyn
2007/10/26 Re: [PATCH 0/2] Version 9 (2.6.24-rc1) Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel Joshua Brindle
2007/10/26 Re: [PATCH 1/2] VFS/Security: Rework inode_getsecurity and callers to return resulting buffer David P. Quigley
2007/10/26 Re: [AppArmor 00/45] AppArmor security module overview Arjan van de Ven
2007/10/26 Re: [AppArmor 35/45] Allow permission functions to tell between parent and leaf checks Stephen Smalley
2007/10/26 Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] capabilities: fix compilation with strict type checking (v2) Stephen Smalley
2007/10/26 Re: [AppArmor 32/45] Enable LSM hooks to distinguish operations on file descriptors from operations on pathnames Miklos Szeredi
2007/10/26 Re: [AppArmor 32/45] Enable LSM hooks to distinguish operations on file descriptors from operations on pathnames Miklos Szeredi
2007/10/26 Re: LSM conversion to static interface Samir Bellabes
2007/10/26 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Tilman Schmidt
2007/10/26 Re: [AppArmor 34/45] Factor out sysctl pathname code James Morris
2007/10/26 Re: [AppArmor 19/45] Add struct vfsmount parameters to vfs_rename() Tetsuo Handa
2007/10/26 Re: [AppArmor 19/45] Add struct vfsmount parameters to vfs_rename() Al Viro
2007/10/26 Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) Jan Engelhardt
2007/10/26 Re: [AppArmor 00/45] AppArmor security module overview John Johansen
2007/10/26 [AppArmor 45/45] Fix file_permission() jjohansen
2007/10/26 [AppArmor 44/45] Switch to vfs_permission() in sys_fchdir() jjohansen
2007/10/26 [AppArmor 43/45] Switch to vfs_permission() in do_path_lookup() jjohansen
2007/10/26 [AppArmor 42/45] Add AppArmor LSM to security/Makefile jjohansen
2007/10/26 [AppArmor 41/45] add simple network toggles to apparmor jjohansen
2007/10/26 [AppArmor 40/45] AppArmor: all the rest jjohansen
2007/10/26 [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation, pathname matching jjohansen
2007/10/26 [AppArmor 38/45] AppArmor: Module and LSM hooks jjohansen
2007/10/26 [AppArmor 37/45] AppArmor: Main Part jjohansen
2007/10/26 [AppArmor 36/45] Export audit subsystem for use by modules jjohansen
2007/10/26 [AppArmor 35/45] Allow permission functions to tell between parent and leaf checks jjohansen
2007/10/26 [AppArmor 34/45] Factor out sysctl pathname code jjohansen
2007/10/26 [AppArmor 33/45] Pass struct file down the inode_*xattr security LSM hooks jjohansen
2007/10/26 [AppArmor 32/45] Enable LSM hooks to distinguish operations on file descriptors from operations on pathnames jjohansen
2007/10/26 [AppArmor 31/45] Add d_namespace_path() to compute namespace relative pathnames jjohansen
2007/10/26 [AppArmor 29/45] Fix __d_path() for lazy unmounts and make it unambiguous jjohansen
2007/10/26 [AppArmor 30/45] Make d_path() consistent across mount operations jjohansen