--- Stephen Smalley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To the contrary, the LSPP work significantly > leverages the work already > done to integrate SELinux and makes use of the > SELinux interfaces for > applications. It also leverages SELinux TE to > address aspects such as > MLS overrides. By doing it within the context of > SELinux, it gained the > benefit of a unified security model and interface. > Which one doesn't get from LSM. There are others who would argue that SELinux has abandoned the Linux privilege model and thus disrupted the unity of the existing security model. I don't understand why the SELinux crew seems so intent on making it difficult to implement alternatives. Last year it was "let's ditch LSM". Now it's "Everyone hates stacking". Give it a rest already. Casey Schaufler [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
