On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 08:25:28PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > Hello. > > > Kyle Moffett wrote: > > > This is probably not acceptable; I doubt there's a chance in hell > > > that TOMOYO will get merged as long as it has text-based-language > > > parsing in the kernel. You also have $NEW_RANDOM_ABUSE_OF_PROCFS and > > > $PATH_BASED_LSM_ISSUES. See the long flamewars on AppArmor for > > > discussion on the latter. > > > > Regarding /proc/tomoyo , this is not a big problem. > > It will be possible to create a dedicated filesystem > > after all other remaining problems are solved. > > Today, I found that I can use securityfs instead of procfs. > Creating entry inside securityfs is more preferable way than > developing a dedicated filesystem, am I right?
Yes, that it what it is there for. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
