Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > No. I mean call the bit PG_private2. That way non-pagecache and > > > filesystems that don't use fscache can use it. > > > > The bit is called PG_owner_priv_2, and then 'subclassed' to PG_fscache, > > much like PG_owner_priv_1 is 'subclassed' to PG_checked as was recommended. > > It is not owner_priv if you're putting checks and tests into core > kernel pagecache code for it. owner_priv means a filesystem has it > _all_ to itself.
Okay, I'll change it if it makes you happy. Bear in mind, though, you're dictating instructions that conflict with those other people have dictated. David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
