On 10/13/2015 10:04 AM, Seth Forshee wrote:
> The SMACK64, SMACK64EXEC, and SMACK64MMAP labels are all handled
> differently in untrusted mounts. This is confusing and
> potentically problematic. Change this to handle them all the same
> way that SMACK64 is currently handled; that is, read the label
> from disk and check it at use time. For SMACK64 and SMACK64MMAP
> access is denied if the label does not match smk_root. To be
> consistent with suid, a SMACK64EXEC label which does not match
> smk_root will still allow execution of the file but will not run
> with the label supplied in the xattr.
>
> Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.fors...@canonical.com>

Aside from the one comment below (which I can be talked out of)
this looks fine.

> ---
>  security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> index 621200f86b56..bee0b2652bf4 100644
> --- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> +++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> @@ -891,6 +891,7 @@ static int smack_bprm_set_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
>       struct inode *inode = file_inode(bprm->file);
>       struct task_smack *bsp = bprm->cred->security;
>       struct inode_smack *isp;
> +     struct superblock_smack *sbsp;
>       int rc;
>  
>       if (bprm->cred_prepared)
> @@ -900,6 +901,10 @@ static int smack_bprm_set_creds(struct linux_binprm 
> *bprm)
>       if (isp->smk_task == NULL || isp->smk_task == bsp->smk_task)
>               return 0;
>  
> +     sbsp = inode->i_sb->s_security;
> +     if (sbsp->smk_flags & SMK_SB_UNTRUSTED && isp->smk_task != 
> sbsp->smk_root)

Call me old fashioned, but how about

        if ((sbsp->smk_flags & SMK_SB_UNTRUSTED) && isp->smk_task != 
sbsp->smk_root)

naked '&'s give me the willies. 

> +             return 0;
> +
>       if (bprm->unsafe & (LSM_UNSAFE_PTRACE | LSM_UNSAFE_PTRACE_CAP)) {
>               struct task_struct *tracer;
>               rc = 0;
> @@ -1703,6 +1708,7 @@ static int smack_mmap_file(struct file *file,
>       struct task_smack *tsp;
>       struct smack_known *okp;
>       struct inode_smack *isp;
> +     struct superblock_smack *sbsp;
>       int may;
>       int mmay;
>       int tmay;
> @@ -1714,6 +1720,10 @@ static int smack_mmap_file(struct file *file,
>       isp = file_inode(file)->i_security;
>       if (isp->smk_mmap == NULL)
>               return 0;
> +     sbsp = file_inode(file)->i_sb->s_security;
> +     if (sbsp->smk_flags & SMK_SB_UNTRUSTED &&
> +         isp->smk_mmap != sbsp->smk_root)
> +             return -EACCES;
>       mkp = isp->smk_mmap;
>  
>       tsp = current_security();
> @@ -3492,16 +3502,14 @@ static void smack_d_instantiate(struct dentry 
> *opt_dentry, struct inode *inode)
>                       if (rc >= 0)
>                               transflag = SMK_INODE_TRANSMUTE;
>               }
> -             if (!(sbsp->smk_flags & SMK_SB_UNTRUSTED)) {
> -                     /*
> -                      * Don't let the exec or mmap label be "*" or "@".
> -                      */
> -                     skp = smk_fetch(XATTR_NAME_SMACKEXEC, inode, dp);
> -                     if (IS_ERR(skp) || skp == &smack_known_star ||
> -                         skp == &smack_known_web)
> -                             skp = NULL;
> -                     isp->smk_task = skp;
> -             }
> +             /*
> +              * Don't let the exec or mmap label be "*" or "@".
> +              */
> +             skp = smk_fetch(XATTR_NAME_SMACKEXEC, inode, dp);
> +             if (IS_ERR(skp) || skp == &smack_known_star ||
> +                 skp == &smack_known_web)
> +                     skp = NULL;
> +             isp->smk_task = skp;
>  
>               skp = smk_fetch(XATTR_NAME_SMACKMMAP, inode, dp);
>               if (IS_ERR(skp) || skp == &smack_known_star ||

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to