On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Andreas Gruenbacher <agrue...@redhat.com> wrote: > Here is another version of the patch queue to make gfs2 and similar file > systems work with SELinux. As suggested by Stephen Smalley [*], the relevant > uses of inode->security are wrapped in function calls that try to revalidate > invalid labels. > > [*] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=144416710207686&w=2 > > The patches are looking good from my point of view; is there anything else > that > needs addressing?
Hi Andreas, I'm largely staying out of the way on this patchset as Stephen has been providing good review and feedback (I see he identified a few more things in this latest revision), however, before I accept this upstream I'd like to see an ACK from one of the GFS developers on the last patch which touches the code under fs/gfs2. Yes, it's a minor change, and probably not strictly necessary, but I would like for us to be good neighbors when possible. Thanks. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
